David Chalmers’ Theory of Consciousness: Critique and Significance

Authors

  • Dr. Sarat Chandra Bibhar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.8224/journaloi.v75i3.1112

Abstract

 

 

 

David Chalmers’ theory of consciousness offers a non-reductive approach that challenges the attempt to explain phenomenal experience entirely in terms of physical and cognitive processes. By distinguishing physical facts from phenomenal facts, Chalmers argues that consciousness should be regarded as a fundamental feature of reality, systematically connected to physical processes through psychophysical principles. His Principle of Structural Coherence explains the relationship between consciousness and awareness, while the Principle of Organizational Invariance emphasizes functional organization as central to conscious experience. His Double-Aspect Theory of Information further proposes that information has both physical and phenomenal aspects, forming the basis of his naturalistic dualism. However, the theory faces significant challenges concerning causal closure, supervenience, psychophysical laws, functionalism, and the explanatory gap. The central unresolved issue is how distinct physical and phenomenal properties can be so precisely related without reducing one to the other.

Downloads

Published

2000

How to Cite

Dr. Sarat Chandra Bibhar. (2026). David Chalmers’ Theory of Consciousness: Critique and Significance. Journal of the Oriental Institute, ISSN:0030-5324 UGC CARE Group 1, 75(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.8224/journaloi.v75i3.1112

Issue

Section

Articles